DR. MUHAMMAD ALI THALHO versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD
Article 199 Constitutional petition The government's request to direct the law on medical fitness, and the retirement age of public representatives and executives, was based on a factual dispute, medical assumption and speculation, of which constitutional jurisdiction Could not be decided under. The petitioner of the High Court did not challenge any order or raise any jurisdiction for the determination. The applicant did not allege infringement of fundamental rights in such an application; the Legislature had exclusive jurisdiction to legislate, amend and / or strike any law according to which the Government has the exclusive right to set policies. Was authorized. According to the Constitution, according to their priorities and requirements, the duty of the High Court is to interpret such laws and policies, but there is no need to legislate or challenge the legislative wisdom in making any particular law, if constitutional limits. If made without qualification, the High Court rejects such pet conditions.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
