The person benefiting from the suspicion of appreciating Section 2 (2 (b) Qatil-e-Amad evidence) stated in his cross-examination that there were 20 houses in the village concerned, but no one came from the village, besides, two witnesses, one complaint. The driver and the second ocular version was incompatible with the medical evidence and the trial court overlooked the material aspect while the hatchet as well as the clothes of the victim were sent for chemical inspection more than a month after the incident. A special indictment was made about that, but the post-mortem report says that the testimony of the eyewitnesses is not credible and on the spot they have Existence was suspected that the prosecution could not take advantage of the weaknesses of the defense - when it was beyond reasonable doubt to prove its case on the evidence presented before the court when the two explained that the ions of evidence were possible, of a prosecutor. In favor of the accused and the other, then the defendant had to accept the interpretation or the theory supporting the accused, for the purpose of suspecting the accused, there was no need for more than one weakness to rationalize the same weakness. Doubts in the mind of a reasonable and sensible person about the truth will make the whole matter suspect the most of the accused law The memorandum was worthwhile and every benefit of the doubt would go to him regardless of whether he made such a request or the credibility and credibility of the eyewitnesses was not full of doubts. Needless to say, the verdict was set aside and the accused was acquitted and released from the charge, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
