Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NADEEM AHMED KHAN versus STATE


Heirs of Sections 561A, 265 C&265 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Sections 2 (37), 3, 6, 7, 11, 14, 15, 22, 23, 26, 34 and 36 HC. Authorities Department dismisses the defendant's request under Section 265K of the trial court for obstructing the trial court from conducting business of making or supplying plastic bags without registration of sales tax, CRPC validity accused The case was heard before a competent court. Able to ensure compliance with Section 265C, the PCC's inherent jurisdiction had no alternative or additional jurisdiction and had to resolve the same complaint for which no other procedure was available, CRPC Could not be used. Petitions rejected for obstruction or turning in the normal course of criminal procedure were dismissed The trial court was ordered to dismiss the case within 6 months. \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Lahore lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.