Section 9 (c) and 25 testimonies of testimony, conviction, failure to return specimen sheets as evidence for drug rehabilitation officers, arrest accused accused of reduction in punishment and arrest 58 kilograms of hashish was seized in a packing of one kilogram each. From their possession, the investigating officer took 10 grams from each packet as a sample and sent them for the same chemical inspection. The accused was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment as no public witness was associated with him at the time of the recovery. Samples were filled in by the Chemical Examiner No one was present at the time of the arrest and the investigating officer, who was charged by the investigating officer, had rightly made advisors from members of the raiding party once the Chemical Examiner reported. I was told that the sample was eaten during the test, the sample wrappers, because the blank did not require t o the sack of 58 bags containing a kilogram each kg, along with the presence of the accused on the motorcycle by Chemical Examiner. Was arrested and denied arrests by anti-narcotic force officials, Specifically, the accused stated in his statement under Section 342, CRPC. Charis did not own it and the police prosecution proved the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt and successfully removed his burden through consistent and convincing evidence, finding the High Court unlawful or weak. Not found The trial court guaranteed interference in his appeal was diabetes, which resulted in his right leg amputated, therefore, the accused was sick of the High Court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
