H.DR. AMJAD IQBAL BHATTI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF HEALTH, ISLAMABAD
Sections 28, 39 and 41 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Misconduct repeatedly violated the Code of Conduct Petitioner was filed as a Homeopath Medical Practitioner and was instead represented as a Homeopathic Doctor. Instead of using a doctor in their doctors' ads. However, after issuing the showcase notice to the applicant, its registration was canceled. It was acknowledged to publish their registration without the permission of the Health Ministry's Advertising Committee, which came under the shadowy act of the Act, though there was no inquiry into the matter, which was dealt with by the High Court Petitioner. He spoke of being a doctor in various advertisements filed by him in various newspapers, which is an independent offense and should be dealt with strictly by the authorities. According to Secuto, the provisions of n 39 (2) and the other provisions of the Greek Ayurvedic and Homeo Practitioners Act, 1965, where the verification of mismanagement and repeated violations of the code of conduct were misconstrued, and the National Court of Home Affairs And urged the federal government to take a harsh view. In addition to the case and the inquiry where the circumstances are affirmed, criminal proceedings against the High Court authorized to exercise constitutional jurisdiction under Article 41 of the Greek Ayurvedic and Homeopathic Practitioners Act, 1965 may also be initiated. ? Petition dismissed for interfering with action by officials
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
