Sections 302 (6), 396, 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Article Qllat eeee murder murder murder murder murder murder murder murder terrorism terrorism terrorism terrorism terrorism terrorism terrorism terrorism terrorism terrorism terrorism terrorism The 65 buffalo were taken along with their colleagues along with terrorism. People from different communities were following the robbers, but none of them were presented as witnesses, even the buffalo owners were not presented as witnesses. It was unbelievable that 65 buffaloes were taken to a major village during the day, but people could not follow the bandits. The suspect was involved in a dispute over property residing near the village of the slain party. Recorded a related person's statement. The complaining party, but the prosecutor did not investigate during the trial. On the contrary, the defense examined the witness, who in his evidence falsified the complainant's evidence and his witnesses were accused. No buffalo was recovered from the occupation of the people. No weapons were recovered from the possession of the accused complainant, who was an eyewitness, did not state the names of the buffalo owners during the trial, on the same evidence a set of suspects was acquitted, while the rest of the accused were convicted. Was heard, which was against the standards of criminal justice once the prosecution case was suspected of a single accused. The same benefit can be given to the other accused, which was not done by the trial court, the same benefit should be extended to the rest of the accused, the prosecution case and the witnesses.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
