Sections 2 (m) (ii), 25 (1) (2) and 35 assessments, correction of the Boundary Wealth Tax Officer, on 30 6 1987, the correction orders were approved but the Commissioner Wealth Tax had 29 of its orders. Approved according to. 3 1990, the Commissioner of the Wealth Tax Officer reasserted the responsibility granted and granted by the Wealth Tax, the Appellate Tribunal maintained on the ground that provided under section 25 (1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 The limit did not apply to the approved orders. Under section 25 (2) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, the property does not intend to waive any assessment at the mercy of the Commissioner Wealth Tax for the indefinite period of the Legislature, for the entire scheme of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963. The risk of an escalation of the risk of a diagnosis in the form of a sword of democracies cannot be allowed to be executed at all, in this regard the order of the appellate tribunal on the question of limitation cannot be maintained, therefore, the decision of the SCCC In favor of The reference against the authorities was dealt with under this
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
