MALIK CHANGEZ KHAN versus PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER, KARACHI
Article 199 Constitution Petition The applicants demanded protection against police involvement and harassment by the police, after which 19 years after the alleged incident, the Deputy Director Anti-Corruption Establishment admitted that they were involved. Failed to find or arrest a civil servant. No permission was available from any competent authority for the alleged crime and the arrest of the fundamental rights of the present accused in the constitution who have given their life and liberty and their behavior in accordance with the law. Had the full protection of the rights of However, it appears that an indispensable worker of the state was clearly and frequently violating the law and even disobeying the orders and directions of the High Court High Court, in which case the jurisdiction was void. Giving up will not stop yourself. Protect False and Respectable Citizens from the T ... He was targeting the police, including anti-corruption police, against the influence and influence of a political figure against the accused. Despite the High Court's directive that the accused could not be arrested till a certain date without his permission, the Anti-Corruption Department had allegedly presented him 19 years ago in the Anti-Corruption case, all of them to the General Police and the Inc. All directors were allowed interim post arrest in all registered cases, with the directive of the director anti-corruption. In any case, the current order of the High Court remains effective for six months without the leave of the High Court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
