Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT ALI CHANNA versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 34 Kutul Um, the actions taken by several persons in the presentation of the joint object bail, pending approval of the trial, further investigation and a speedy trial of each. Recognized was a constitutional right. The accused accused of delaying 3/2 years at trial was not found to be entitled to bail privileges as he led the commission of the alleged crime as the main accused in the investigation, with a direct role in committing the murder. And further inquiry was warranted. Atta

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• JAUDAT HASSAN v. BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, KARACHI through Secretary 2011 CLC 867
• Malik CHANGEZ KHAN v. PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER, KARACHI 2011 YLR 868
• FAREEDUDDIN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2011 PLC(CS) 870
• Mst. ISLAM KHATOON v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION MANJOO SHORI, DISTRICT NASIRABAD, BALOCHISTAN 2011 PCrLJ 871
• MUHAMMAD YASEEN v. 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, HYDERABAD 2011 MLD 881
• FAISALABAD OIL REFINERY (PVT.) LTD. v. M.T. GALAXY 2011 CLD 885
• MUHAMMAD USMAN v. RAMZAN 2011 YLR 885
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI v. STATE ENTERPRISES MUTUAL FUND, KARACHI 2011 PTD 886

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

famous lower court advocate from Kotmomin lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes