COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES-I, KARACHI versus STATE ENTERPRISES MUTUAL FUND, KARACHI
Section 2 (29A) and Second Schedule, CL 105 Moderba Companies and Income Taxes as Moderba (Flotation and Control) Ordinance (1980's XNXI), Section 2 (i) (A) and 8 Moderba. The waiver claim was made by the State Enterprise Mutual Funds Player of Authority which did not entitle Essacy to such waivers because they were not eligible for Moderba under the Moderba Companies and Section 8 of the Moderba (Flotation and Control) Ordinance, 1980. I think words of integrity will be understood in harmony so that everyone can find meaning. The words included herein have the meaning given to Moderba in section 2 (i) (a) of the Ordinance, in the name of its unit trusts and mutual funds pursuant to section 2 (29A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. Shall read, which shall be considered as modarbus for the purposes of implementing all provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, including name tax treatment, once referred to in the Ordinance as the reference to the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Adoption was not adopted for the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which was adopted by the Ordinance 1980, by the assessment of Moderb eligibility, which was adopted The tax treatment mutual funds included in the definition of Moderba will also be included. Be entitled to the same tax treatment as Modarbasa Assisi was evaluated as Modarbus in principle.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
