The doubt of the superiority and the appreciation of the evidence in Sections 2 (2 (b), 4 32at and Q 34) will eliminate both the old / past enmity between the parties, as this may be the purpose of the crime. It has been revealed that the deceased died on the spot immediately on the spot, but medical evidence has clearly shown that the time between the injured and the dead was about half an hour and that the investigator immediately examined the complainant. The FIR was lodged after the police visited Vardhat's place, it was proved that after good advice and consideration, the FIR was lodged. In this case, Malala was listed very quickly in the case, which otherwise could not be believed in this case. There was a contradiction between the molecular evidence and the medical evidence and all such contradictions, in the case of prosecution by independent villagers who raised suspicion on the occasion after the hearing. The prosecution's prosecution witnesses were not examined by the prosecution only to the close of the complainant. They examined the relatives even though they belonged to the complainant, but even then their evidence contradicted the material details. The ocular account presented by the prosecutor did not constitute trust, contacting the accused for the alleged crime. The nature of the action was not available, no further evidence was presented to substantiate the prosecution's case because the crime established in the FIR and given to the accused
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
