Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KANEEZ FATIMA versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD


Show your reaction with XIII, r 2, O XLI, r 1 Civil appeal whether merely filing a copy of the trial court's decision could affect the eligibility of the appeal for immunity and the second appeal to the High Court of Appeal Allows timely decision-making. Appeal to consider the question is granted

1975 S C M R 254

Present : Salahuddin Ahmad and Muhammad Gul, JJ

Mst. KANEEZ FATIMA‑Petitioner

versus

GHULAM MUHAMMAD ETC‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 488 of 1974, decided on 28th October 1974.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated She 5tb of February 1974, in R. S. A. No. 117 of 1970).

Civil Procedure Code (V of 19080--

--- O. XIII, r. 2, react with O. XLI, r. 1‑Civil appeal‑Whether mere omission to file copy of trial Court's judgment can affect competence of appeal and High Court on second appeal should permit appellant to put in judgment within a specified time‑Leave to appeal granted to consider question.

Khawaja Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 28th October 1974.

ORDER

SALAHUDDIN AHMED, J.‑

The petitioner has been aggrieved by the dismissal of his second appeal by the High Court on the ground that the appeal was not accompanied by a copy of the judgment of the trial Court as required under Order XII1, Rule b., read with Order XLI, rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It appears that this omission escaped the notice of the Bench admitting second appeal to a regular hearing. The omission was discovered by the learned Single Judge of the High Court before whom the appeal appeared for a regular hearing. It was, however, then too late to repair the damage as the time had run out for putting in the copy of the judgment of the trial Court.

It has been contended before us that once the appeal has been admitted to a regular hearing, the mere omission to fit‑ a copy of the trial Court's judgment cannot affect the competence of the appeal, and that the learned Single Judge could and should have permitted the petitioner to put in the judgment within a specified time.

It appears that for consideration of a similar question leave was granted by this Court in Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 5711 of 1972 on the 12th of July, 1973. We, accordingly, grant leave to appeal. Security for costs Rs. 1,000, Prayer for stay is refused.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Bhalwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.