Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 313 of 1970, decided on 1lth April 1974.
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court at Lahore, dated the 25th of September 1970, in Settlement Revision No. 1 of 1974.
‑‑ Art. 185(3)‑Petition for clarification of an order passed by Court‑Unknown to Rules framed by Supreme Court‑Order passed and signed‑Court became functus officio‑Under if wrongly interpreted by any Court or authority remedy lay in appeal or revision according to law.
Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.
Abdul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Date of hearing : l1th April 1974.
This is a petition for clarification of our order dismissing with certain observations in Civil Petition No. 313 of 1970 for special leave to appeal. We had observed that the Additional Settlement Commissioner (Land) while hearing the matter on remand should not permit matters relating to the rights of the parties that came into existence since the 13th of July, 1960, to be canvassed in the case.
Such a petition is unknown to the Rules framed by this Court. Besides this Court became functus officio after it had passed and signed the order.
If any Court or authority proceeds to interpret our order wrongly the petitioner may have his remedy according to law by way of appeal or revision.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer