The Investigation Officer charged the statements of the prosecution witnesses under Section 361 / A3 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Abduction for Abduction and Evidence of Terrorism Act, Section 161, CR PC. After the arrest of the persons and the recovery of the allegedly kidnapped child, on whom the suspicions were cast, the suspects were not free in these cases, private witnesses were set up by the police and the whole The story was prepared. In the case of police suspicion, no penalty can be given and the accused should be given the benefit of the doubt, not a matter of grace, but as a matter of fact, anything should go in favor of the accused, he must Care must be taken and that should be taken advantage of. Suspicion, if any, can be extended to the suspect, in many cases there was no need to create doubt so that the suspect could be given the benefit of the doubt. In any case which raised reasonable doubt in an intelligent mind, enough to acquit the accused, the complaining party had to look into the abduction court, the purpose of the abduction, the accused directly or some of his agents. No payment of ransom was paid by. The same was done to forfeit money or property or to force a person related to the abduction to take advantage of it, along with the accused who was the complainant's spouse, Abduction and ransom was demanded, in which case the prosecution raised serious doubts. I had to prove my case beyond reasonable doubt. And the accused was considered innocent until that time
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
