Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI versus STATE

Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 2 Q2 / e 34 Qatil Ahmed bail, denied the name of the accused in the FIR, the accused could not have the joint intention of the accused with the role of firing on the accused at the bail stage. Be determined because the accused has been convicted of the death sentence and the innocence and guilt and the charge will be settled by the trial court, the complainant explained the delay in filing the FIR, which will allow any further investigation Failed to submit. , The bail was not eligible for a discount The bail application was dismissed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• LOTTE PAKISTAN PTA LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2011 PTD 2229
• SHAHID alias AAMIR v. State 2011 YLR 2238
• MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. State 2011 YLR 2259
• MUHAMMAD SADDIQUE v. State 2011 YLR 2261
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. SEMEA, KARACHI 2011 PTD 2275
• SAEED AHMED KHAN alias SHEEDO v. State 2011 YLR 2277
• MUHAMMAD BUX v. State 2011 YLR 2283
• RUSTAM v. State 2011 YLR 2287

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Sadiqabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes