Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NASIR KHAN AFRIDI versus STATE


Section 497 (2) of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) drug bail, possession of drugs on spying information despite arrest of the accused in the Ganjanabad area. was not. The private witnesses with the recovery proceedings, where, despite preliminary information, respected persons in the area were not involved in the rehabilitation proceedings against the accused, the charges against them will require further investigation. Minimum exceeded 1000 gram limit, which was the border line between clause (b) and clause (c) of Section 9 of the Drug Control Act 1997, and this aspect was also used to determine his crime. Need further investigation, the record may not be deeply appreciated. The bail-out phase and the initial relationship of the accused with the commission of the crime also had to be seen further in the case of the accused. In section 497 (2), the circumstances under consideration and under CCPC Accordingly, they were allowed to bail

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.