MALIK GUL MUHAMMAD AWAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE
Section 35A & 48 Sue Sales Tax Department officials fined the plaintiff's factory for failing to pay tax amounting to Rs. Imposing that he was bringing some of his belongings to his factory in such a vehicle, which was forcibly occupied by personnel who detained him at his headquarters all night, where he attacked, misbehaved. ? The appellate tribunal dismissed such a forfeiture order and jointly and severally sued the plaintiff against such an officer, denouncing the conduct of such personnel with the plaintiff and the qualified individual. 1,00,000 was approved by the court. The manner and manner in which such officer was treated was an inhumane matter with him. Corruption or misconduct with the taxpayer does not authorize and license the pending tax order for such officer. Such an officer took the law that was intended to be inadvertent and the plaintiff based his claim only on the basis of damages and only on the basis of the expected damages. Without bringing the plaintiff's damages in full, extortion was made and he failed to prove through evidence that the suit could not be punished for damages in the presence of damages by the plaintiff. Yes, the plaintiff suffered mental trauma and torture. Tax collection is your personal satisfaction with taxpayers
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
