Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 384, 109 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6 (1) (k) Exemption and Terrorism Guarantees, further investigations approved In the same FIR, which did not appear, the complainant was shown at the site of the alleged incident from the police station, the police number consultant did not come to the spot in connection with the alleged receipt of cash received by the accused. Was. In his possession, the adviser had stated in question that the accused had already been taken to the police station on the spot where such counsel had been prepared. The complainant also confessed to a question that both advisers were subordinate to him, demanded Bhutta through the accused on the mobile phone, further investigation was also required, the accused was entitled to the privilege of bail, he was granted bail. Was admitted, under the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
