Find a Lawyer

MISS SUBEEN MUKHTAR versus CHAIRMAN

Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Applying for a Degree in Educational Institutions, without interruption, sought guidance for the issuance of a degree as it appeared and qualified for the same authority that the applicant qualified for the award. Attendance can be directed to Wawa Voice. According to the rules of the relevant university authorities, the degree was directed to issue the latest call letter to check and evaluate the applicant's viva voce without affecting the fact that the applicant had received some relief. The High Court had expected that the applicant would be treated in accordance with the law.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• ZAHID HUSSAIN v. State 2011 YLR 2853
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. QASIM IRON MERCHANT 2011 PTD 2853
• INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES LTD. v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 2011 PTD 2861
• IRSHAD ALI v. State 2011 YLR 2861
• SULTAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through, Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh 2011 PTD 2871
• ASRAR ALAM SHAIKH v. ADMINISTRATOR DHA 2011 YLR 2873
• CONTINENTAL CABLE (PVT.) LTD. v. CHINA HARBOR ENGINEERING CO. LTD. 2011 YLR 2876
• PAKISTAN STATE OIL, COMPANY LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF WORKS 2011 YLR 2886

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

online advocate from Kallat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes