Find a Lawyer

INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Sections 25A, 25D and 196 Determining the Value of Customs (Technical) Powers to decide the question regarding the law Prima fax, sitting alone by the Member (Technical) sitting on the law matter (Technical). , Had no jurisdiction to decide the law and could accept such jurisdiction even though such a question was not proposed, but having a jurisdiction, the High Court could compose a new question and so on. Can answer fresh High Court questions. As a result, the adverse order was set aside and the appellate tribunal was brought to trial before the appropriate bench, giving both sides the opportunity to decide the appeal within a period of 60 days.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI v. POWER ELECTRONIC PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE 2011 PTD 2837
• PAKISTAN TELEPHONE CABLES LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Finance 2011 PTD 2849
• ZAHID HUSSAIN v. State 2011 YLR 2853
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. QASIM IRON MERCHANT 2011 PTD 2853
• IRSHAD ALI v. State 2011 YLR 2861
• Miss SUBEEN MUKHTAR v. CHAIRMAN 2011 YLR 2869
• SULTAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through, Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh 2011 PTD 2871
• ASRAR ALAM SHAIKH v. ADMINISTRATOR DHA 2011 YLR 2873

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates from Allahabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes