Find a Lawyer

CONTINENTAL CABLE (PVT.) LTD. versus CHINA HARBOR ENGINEERING CO. LTD.

Section 20 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 126 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 Application for filing in a court arbitration agreement and requesting a mediator to refer the matter to the defendant The petition to prevent Ali from performing the cash is still in the process of completing the work between the bank guarantee parties until the settlement of the matter by arbitration, which the arbitrator multiplies by proof before the completion of the pending work under the plaintiff's contract. Will need to be applied, thus the loss of such a guarantee will be harmful at this time. His interest was to prevent the defendant from exceeding such bail until the High Court settled the case before the plaintiff.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• IRSHAD ALI v. State 2011 YLR 2861
• Miss SUBEEN MUKHTAR v. CHAIRMAN 2011 YLR 2869
• SULTAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through, Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh 2011 PTD 2871
• ASRAR ALAM SHAIKH v. ADMINISTRATOR DHA 2011 YLR 2873
• PAKISTAN STATE OIL, COMPANY LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF WORKS 2011 YLR 2886
• TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. UNIVERSAL NAVIGATION (PTE.) LTD. 2011 YLR 2893
• TARIQ MEHMOOD A. KHAN v. SINDH BAR COUNCIL 2011 YLR 2899
• ABDUL GHAFFAR JANGDA v. Haji ABDULLAH HAROON MUSLIM GYMKHANA 2011 YLR 2907

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates phone number from FR Kohat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes