Find a Lawyer

TARIQ MEHMOOD A. KHAN versus SINDH BAR COUNCIL

Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of scope relief under the Koto warrant was completely arbitrary as the matter could not be issued by the court and the inquiry into the conduct and motives of the concerned is not a special rule. ? Was present to exercise discretion in deciding or denying the nature of the warrant issued by the court

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• ASRAR ALAM SHAIKH v. ADMINISTRATOR DHA 2011 YLR 2873
• CONTINENTAL CABLE (PVT.) LTD. v. CHINA HARBOR ENGINEERING CO. LTD. 2011 YLR 2876
• PAKISTAN STATE OIL, COMPANY LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF WORKS 2011 YLR 2886
• TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. UNIVERSAL NAVIGATION (PTE.) LTD. 2011 YLR 2893
• ABDUL GHAFFAR JANGDA v. Haji ABDULLAH HAROON MUSLIM GYMKHANA 2011 YLR 2907
• Dr. ANJUM ARA MANZAR v. State 2011 YLR 2914
• MAHESH LAL v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through the Secretary Ministry of Excise and Taxation Sindh 2011 YLR 2925
• SHERAL v. SAJAN alias SAJOO 2011 YLR 2929

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

ask a advocate free from Garh Maharaja lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes