SONERI BANK LIMITED versus CLASSIC DENIM MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED
Sections 9 (2) and 10 (3) (4) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 10 leave to defend the suit for bank loan collection, was for the claimant's request that the account filed with the incomplete statement be dismissed can go. The transcript filed in response to the claimant's request to leave the application stated that the statements of the accounts were complete, correct and legal, but due to academic error, the plaintiff's entire statement could not be entered in the account which he attached to the accounts. Submit additional documentation with a statement of The defendant's further request, after filing a copy without obtaining leave from the bank court, was to file a further statement of accounts with the duplicate and then to refuse, again by filing additional documents with the statement of accounts. Deprived of the opportunity, as such, there can be no liability. Without recording the parties' evidence, it is determined on the basis that the bank's accuracy duty was to file a full statement of accounts with Plaintiff when filing a lawsuit. o Such an obligation was to provide a fair opportunity to the defendants to provide a reasonable opportunity for the defense to recover the suit (tax recovery) pursuant to section 10 of the Ordinance, 2001, of the court's leave. After accepting the application, it will behave in the same manner as the written statement. The defendant is not permitted by law to file further or fresh leave if the plaintiff is left open and is required to file statements in fragments by a duplicate or separate statement. If allowed, defendants have more opportunity to contest or respond to subsequent statements of accounts pursuant to Article 10A Can't get it came
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
