ISA RAZA KHAN versus PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
Section 7 (2) and 3 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 7 of the Constitutional Petitioner's claim for joint pension provision was not accepted. The ordinance, 1982, was the State of the Civil Aviation Authority, whose term was interpreted in section 7 of the Constitution, therefore, the constitutional petition was enforceable, which was taxed. 3). The Civil Aviation Authority Ordinance was compensated for various services performed by the 1982 Civil Aviation Authority and was not the same tax or cess. Was imposed for while the tax was. There was no independent action and no service performance under the Authority of Parliament. The Civil Aviation Authority was a body corporate under section 3 (2) of the Civil Aviation Authority. Rights Aviation, 1982, Civil Aviation Authority Employees `were not civil servants ??? In the absence of any legal rules, it was not appropriate to retain constitutional application by such employees lim r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
