M. SAEED QURESHI AL-WARSI versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, HOUSING AND WORKS, ISLAMABAD
The section 82 order was passed against the federal government to recover the money for implementation. The court directed the federal government / decision debtor to deposit the amount of court endorsement in section 82, which would provide the CPC two opportunities for the government to fulfill this decree. The requirement must be met, but if it was sufficiently compliant, it was not necessary to act in any particular form if there was a reasonable period between the institution of the order and the application for implementation. , Unless the decree itself was provided. Such a period of execution had to convince the court that a reasonable period had passed and if the court was satisfied, if the decision was to give credibility to the provincial government, it would have to consider it through section 82, CPC. According to the report should provide another opportunity. The debtor was the federal government, then the implementing court can either report to the prosecutor ial the government or the federal government only for a period of three months as a matter of judgment and to avoid any case of constitutional abuse. 82, the CPC requirement would be substantially complied with if such an execution was unlawfully issued in the meantime, the execution of such execution must proceed. Be suspended while opportunities were being provided to the government If the order was inappropriate then the process from which they were suspended was granted the order on 30, 2010, while the request for execution 10 11 Filed in 2010. The decision under discussion was a mini-decree and a dialogue between making and executing the decree
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
