MUHAMMAD ZAFAR SIDDIQUI versus MUHAMMAD QAMAR SIDDIQUI
Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Axis, R12 Participants were the original shareholders in the shareholder's share of the original restoration of the profits claimed by the claimant who demanded its distribution and asked the defendants for the use of the property. Maison also sought recovery of profits. To the extent of 50% of the property was the plaintiff and the plaintiff co-owner of the property, there was nothing in the record to show that there was any other claimant for the suit property, there was no denial on behalf of the defendants, therefore available on record. , There is no exception to the decision to direct the preparation of preliminary injunctions. The option to make property according to the property was established, therefore, the distribution and distribution of the property cannot be ruled out, unless it is shown that such property is not capable of distribution and distribution. It was established and the court concluded that the person is entitled to any right or part of the property and is being deprived of the use of such right or part of the property by another person, then the owner, Was outside the possession or enjoyment of the person, the person has the right to claim the profits that he or she has actually acquired or enjoyed in this part of the possession. Mason's profit was filed by the plaintiff to the extent of his share or to the plaintiff's determination of the interest or interest in the property, but it cannot be convinced by the plaintiffs that there was any positive evidence that the defendants received Regarding actual income or gain, while enjoying the suit property order pursuant to the terms of the OX, R12, CPC, it was ordered that
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
