Section 2 (c) and 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application The dismissal of the relationship between the landlord and the tenant of the tenant was between brother and sister and the disputed cover was owned by his late father. At the time of renting the premises was his father's lawyer and receiving rent from the tenant on behalf of his father The respondent (sister) claimed that his father had gifted him the cover so he became the owner. Before receiving any notice of a change in ownership, Tenant Dee took over the premises and filed a takeover application. Regarding the responder has allowed his brother (the applicant) and deliberately withdraw the petition against default controller rent the tenant and approved the evacuation order, which was upheld by a lower appellate court. Treat the tenant in the house as a tenant in question as he was receiving rent from the tenant as his father and the landlord moved in as defined by the section on the West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959. Given in 2 (c), the applicant, being a member of the deceased owner's family, was occupying the demolished premises, no evidence that the house could not be treated as a tenant. It was not that the tenant or the applicant paid any rent to the respondents after the termination of the lease agreement, as the landlord among the parties. The tenant and tenant relationship did not exist. The execution of the gift in favor of the respondent woman was not completed as the possession of the house was not provided for and
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
