AURANGZEB SHAAFI BURKI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, LAHORE
Section 3 (4) Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 101, 104, 105 and 1991 Constitution Petition Chairman Punjab Service Tribunal, Appointment of Acting Governor Applicant to the Chief Minister's Advisor to the Punjab Governor Tribunal on the advice of Acting Governor Chief Minister What I meant to do was that the Acting Governor was given the authority to perform only the functions of the day, and no decision / decision on any policy issue or any appointment was made with the authority or authority, in which the Chairman Service He was the Chairman of the Punjab Service Tribunal, including the duration of the Tribunal. The appointment of the Governor by the Punjab under section 3 (4) of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, was one of the functions of the Governor, for which purpose, he was obliged by the advice of the Chief Minister, it was the only incumbent, the Chief Minister of Punjab. At the discretion and authority to decide and discuss the selection and appointment of the Chairman of the Punjab Service Tribunal, under Article 105 of the Constitution, the Governor was bound by the "advice" of the Governor to such counsel of the Chief Minister, Was not permitted by law to reject the advice or substitute their own search. Instead, no decision was made by Governor Punjab to appoint and appoint the Chairman Punjab Service Tribunal for any appointment. The decision of the Chief Minister was to consider the formal act to put into practice. was done. According to Article 105 of the Constitution, there was no need for Governor Punjab to make any decision on the selection and appointment of the Chairman Punjab Service Tribunal, and the Chief Minister would regularly consult the Governor to implement the decision.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
