Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed appreciated the evidence, the deceased's father did not complain and based his FIR on the information received from the two witnesses, the trial court correctly revealed the motive behind the incident. What was Strong evidence with sufficient knowledge of the witnesses, although closely related to the victim, was not identified during the beating of the suspect and the suspect was correctly identified at the time of the incident, eye witnesses reported the matter until the next morning. No one was given the fact that their highly unusual behavior was not exhibited by the medical evidence supporting the evidence of the prosecutor. The recoveries were neither affected by the accused nor at the time of the incident, by the prosecutor. To no avail, the trial defendants had already denied the prosecution's evidence against the two co-accused in the case. Was denied and the present accused was not confirmed by any independent evidence, the case against the accused was suspicious, beneficial, of which the accused was acquitted not as a matter of grace but in the matter of truth.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
