Plaintiffs' section 9 and 12 for possession by specific performance of the contract as well as the trial court and the appellate court were dismissed on the ground that the minor witnesses had not been examined, as such agreement Was not proved because there are two minor witnesses. He died before recording the evidence and as such it was mandatory by the court to pass the order. Ignoring the fact that the two minor witnesses were not examined, it was not proved that the witnesses were not alive. The plaintiff admitted that he did not pay the individually owed wages to the shopkeepers according to their shares and According to the plaintiff's admission, he had paid the amount to one of the shopkeepers, sufficient to negate the plaintiff's claim that all the shopkeepers were willing to sell. The plaintiff did not say that the plaintiff had failed to identify any misunderstanding or misreading of the court's decisions, below The revision request was rejected in \ r \ n \ r. n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
