Sections 302 (b) / 34 and 302/109 Katiel Am, evidence of deception benefiting the suspect Complaint created a false motive to include the accused in the case Prosecutor barred independent witnesses from the area related to ocular testimony Was. Medical evidence contradicts eyewitnesses who improved their statements at trial, after witnessing the victim's injuries on the victim's FIR, they received reports of Kalashnikov's recovery from the victim's suspect. Was later removed. In connection with the pistols recovered from the other accused of the Franz Science Laboratory report, the positive report of the Franz Science Laboratory was of no benefit to the prosecution, which could not be recovered even when the prosecution witnesses were not present at the time of the incident. Used as a contradictory piece of evidence to deny key evidence. He was charged with murder. Evidence does not show that the victim was in any way motivated to commit murder. Or be assisted, which were the essential components of the sentence under section 109, the PPC read with section 302 (b) 134, which could have resulted in the disappearance of other persons appearing in the PPC incident. The suspects, who were fiercely hostile to it, were acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
