HAKEEM ABDUL GHAFFAR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT OFFICER REVENUE
Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXXXXX, RR 1 and 2, filed suit against the defendants for a declaration and permanent injunction on the ground that it had purchased the disputed property in open auction and that 1/5 of the time. The auctioneer also filed a petition for approval of a temporary injunction under O XXXXX, Rr 1 & 2, CPC, and applied on the basis that the trial court of the provincial government hearing the ownership of the disputed property. Appeal request accepted. The court, on appeal, vacated the temporary order issued by the trial court's plaintiff, stating that the Provincial Board of Revenue had not given notice of cancellation of the auction proceedings, as it had been approved by the competent authority. The order is illegal and is bound to be rejected. , There was no legal requirement for the competent authority / provincial board of revenue not to give the plaintiff any notice at that time. The auctioneer approving / confirming the auction proceedings claimed the right on the disputed property, which has been canceled in his name for the past 17 years. Despite the passage of time, he did not bother to collect the remaining auctioned value of the disputed property or resented the right of the competent revenue authorities to claim that the possession of the disputed property was grossly illegal and that he was in any way illegal. Could not claim. The High Court dismissed the court's request for a legal cover revision
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
