Find a Lawyer

SHER MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL

Article 33 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 8 suits the consent of the referee with the consent of the parties to the referee, information statement of the meaning and scope of any new inquiry or any assessment, verification process Required. Evidence made by law is outside the scope of the \ "Statement of Information \" under Article 1984 of 1984 and turns the referee into either a local commission or arbitrator as the case may be. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• ARSHAD ALI v. MUSHTAQ AHMAD 2011 YLR 404
• JAVED IQBAL v. ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE 2011 PCrLJ 405
• AKBAR ALI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 408
• MUHAMMAD YOUNAS v. TOWN COMMITTEE WARBARTON, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT NANKANA SAHIB 2011 CLC 409
• Mrs. SHAHBAZ BASHIR v. CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 PLC(CS) 413
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. State 2011 YLR 415
• MUHAMMAD SABIR v. Mst. AZRA BIBI 2011 CLC 417
• Hakeem ABDUL GHAFFAR v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Officer Revenue 2011 MLD 417

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

jobs for advocates from Dera Bugti lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes