Section 302 (b) / 324/148/149 Qatim Alam, the claimant who appreciated the evidence and even some other witnesses were police officers and had no reason to be present because they were not present in the area. The presence of the deceased at the scene of the incident, which came from the distance, was without any reason stated that the witnesses could not be relied on in independent sources without any collusion, which was missing in this case. The prosecution, which came on record through FIR, was found guilty of medical evidence; the prosecutor's case was falsified by medical evidence; in the circumstances the complainant and both injured witnesses changed their position while appearing in court. The complainant's statement during the period has undergone such a change and the witnesses clearly indicate that the witnesses are trying to improve their case by improving / contradicting the medical evidence. During the trial court proceedings, the eyewitnesses caused serious disturbances in the prosecution case, the co-accused who was assigned the same role, who was acquitted by the trial court, suspected of involvement in the case. Was done , Under the circumstances; and it was not possible to know who was responsible for the deceased's death. Ten offenders could be released, but the court could not afford to prosecute an innocent person. The prosecutor failed to prove the motive for his case. The ocular account brought on record in the case can easily be said to be not above the board; the prosecution was not supported by the gun recovery; recovered from the crime scene.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
