Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition The suit of the plaintiff, who was the plaintiff's wife and minor daughter, was filed for recovery of the amount of restitution. The family court and the appellate court dismissed the case for allowing the wife to recover Rs 2,000 per month. Defendant challenged that several daughters and wives were also allowed to recover Rs 4,000 for dowry, several decisions and saying that the amount of care for both courts was not properly assessed as it had this order. There was no way to pay. The main rent evidence revealed that the defendant was working as a laborer and he was also operating the cart, keeping in view the increase in prices in the country, the amount paid for maintenance was normal and needed. Was no more than the lawyer for the defendant had failed to identify. Any misstatement or non-reading of the above judgments of the above courts, which may be affected, is not a matter of interference with the above decisions and decrees of the two courts, in exercising the Constitutional powers of the High Court. , Constitutional requests, were rejected in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
