Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR RASUL versus HAFSA RASUL

Article 5, Schedule and Article 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 of the Constitution for the Rehabilitation of Minors, the trial court dismissed the defendant's right to defend and dismissed his request to dismiss the order. The plaintiff did not take the order of the court seriously to pay the arrears for his minor daughters and himself appeared before the trial court under his authority under Section 17A of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. This unauthorized order was approved. Removing any illegal or malpractice order in involuntary orders demanding the High Court's intervention in its constitutional jurisdiction removes the constitutional petition \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• ALI AKHTAR v. State 2011 PCrLJ 983
• ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN v. Haji SULTAN MEHMOOD 2011 CLC 986
• MUHAMMAD USMAN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRANWALA 2011 YLR 989
• AGROCARE v. ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. 2011 CLD 990
• MAZHAR IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2011 YLR 995
• ALLAH RAKHA v. Mst. BHAGWANI BAI 2011 MLD 996
• IRFAN ALI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 998
• GUL SHER v. Mst. MARYAM SULTANA 2011 YLR 1000

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

criminal advocate from Nilore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes