Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD USMAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRANWALA

The trial court ruled in this regard for Article 5 and the scheduled constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 constitutional restitution and recovery of the articles of dowry, while the appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal. The constitutional application for his income and ownership of the property and any false reading or non-reading that could be guaranteed to interfere with the High Court was dismissed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• KHAIRAT HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SHEIKHUPURA 2011 YLR 979
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. State 2011 MLD 983
• ALI AKHTAR v. State 2011 PCrLJ 983
• ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN v. Haji SULTAN MEHMOOD 2011 CLC 986
• AGROCARE v. ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. 2011 CLD 990
• MUNAWAR RASUL v. HAFSA RASUL 2011 MLD 991
• MAZHAR IQBAL v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2011 YLR 995
• ALLAH RAKHA v. Mst. BHAGWANI BAI 2011 MLD 996

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

list of advocates from Feroz Watan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes