Article 5 and Schedule to the Divorce and Gift of Gifts (XLIII) Act, 1976 (Article XLIII), Article 3 and 5 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court scope suit dissolution marriage, rehabilitation and return of dowry The appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal for immunity. The defendant's sole statement was not sufficient to prove that the dowry articles were purchased from the money provided by her, the woman owning all the property given as a dowry or bridal gift to exclude her. Was. Under section 5 of the Dowry and Bridal Gifts (Prohibition) Act 1976, section 3 of the Husband and Bride Gifts (Prohibition) Act 1976, despite the restrictions imposed on the value of dowry and bride gifts, the owner of the bride and groom's articles And she was entitled. Maintaining and claiming the return of such articles if she is deprived of the value or resources of the art by her husband or anyone else, under Article 199 of the Constitution, the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court is natural. As was arbitrary, exercising a constitutional jurisdiction, the court had to ensure that the subordinate court or tribunal could not operate under its constitutional jurisdiction without any jurisdiction or violation of law. Re-present evidence as a Court of Appeal The Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide a case. The fact that a decision was wrong would have been made without lawful authority and it would not have faced any decision. Scope Defect Bail Exits Within High Court Constitutional Request
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
