Section 2302 (), the definition of convicted AMD evidence was filed with the FIR with a specific role assigned to the defendants very quickly. The incident was a minor incident, as well as other witnesses due to previous litigation. On the spot. At that time both witnesses had unanimously mentioned the pros and cons of the incident, including the complainant, explaining the involvement of the accused and the role played by him, as well as every material aspect of the incident, including blood. The stain was collected from the ground and the blanks of the crime. The suspect's complaint with the pistol recovered from the suspect after the arrest or the witness's relationship with the victim and their unethical behavior with the accused was not sufficient to break their evidence, which can be believed. Even if without the co-operation, if the same media could be trusted, the evidence further supported the ocular testimony that the motive established by the prosecution stood on the record that included the accused's involvement in the murder's murder commission. It was completely proved, his conviction was maintained that the nine accused were shot individually. The complainant, in the private complaint as well as the FIR, had faced the disapproval of his own death. The complainant tried to get involved in the case while the maximum number of members of the other party, including the prosecution witnesses, exacerbated the story, and the whole truth was discussed between the parties. / Be peaceful for 17 years. The record does not say whether the deceased was killed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
