Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus AMJAD ALI

The section 12 suit trial court and the appellate court for special performance dismissed the case, which failed to present proof of payment to the plaintiff who was seventeen years old and was not accompanied by his sons at the time of payment. As the plaintiff was entitled to the document, the handwriting expert or petitioner was obliged to submit, contradictions of the material disclaimer were found in the statements of the witnesses presented by the claimant and the false document ? The court, in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MAXI INC. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PTD 1117
• TARIQ MEHMOOD v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Education, Lahore 2011 PLC(CS) 1120
• MUSADDAQ v. State 2011 MLD 1120
• BARKAT ALI SALAH UD DIN AHMAD & CO. (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance 2011 PTD 1122
• QAISER HUSSAIN alias KASHI alias KASHIF v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1126
• KHALID JAVED NIAZI v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLC(CS) 1127
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. MEHMOOD AHMAD 2011 YLR 1131
• Mst. NAZAR BIBI v. IMTIAZ HUSSAIN 2011 MLD 1134

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocate from Sanghi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes