QAISER HUSSAIN ALIAS KASHI ALIAS KASHIF versus STATE
Section 656565 An Anti-Terrorism Act (VI XX XX XX XXVII), Definition of Prohibition for the Abduction of Section 21 L The trial by the trial court was that the identification parade to identify the accused was Was not held and neither ransom money nor any weapons could be recovered from the crime in which the accused was suspected of being identified, the identification parade provided a mechanism for the crime of an innocent person. In order to rule out all possibility of making false accusations in the commission, the identification parade was necessary. The suspect's name was listed in the FIR filed by the complainant, and was confirmed by the prosecution's witness abduction, which remained in the prison for approximately 5-6. Within days, the accused had the opportunity to look at the witness, and while appearing as a witness, the trial court's identification of the accused did not arise in any circumstances requiring the identification of the parade. ??? For six years, the recovery of the ransom money and the weapons of the present weapons were not used, which the trial court rightly sentenced and sentenced. Against the accused by the High Court and the same was upheld the appeal was dismissed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
