A XVII, Rule 2 and 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Trial Court dismisses trial for illegal proceedings as well as absence of evidence. , Said that the court was not required to observe evidence in the absence of evidence and added that such an observation can only take place if the plaintiff is present and fails to present evidence. If the case is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, the order in connection with the dismissal of the case for failure to present evidence was excessive and in fact it was not required because the order of the part of the justice was defeated completely and the unconstitutional order appeared very stringent. Because only three opportunities were afforded to the plaintiff. The law is not about competence but in favor of adjudication of cases. Therefore, the application of the techniques should not defeat the outcome of justice because the law did not intend that the High Court did not allow the constitutional application and give the plaintiff another opportunity to present documentary evidence by giving oral evidence. Put aside inactive orders.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
