Sections 302 (b), 324, 114, 148 and 149 assassination attempt, compilation of murder case, confession, confusion, joint testimony were appreciated. They all identified the accused and stated that each The defendant's witnesses failed to some extent during the cross-examination defense, despite their efforts, the statements of the witnesses, which were unconstitutional, said their testimony said that the witnesses had played their part. Not to push aside the complainant and interested, when the complainant's presence was not challenged in ard Wardad, all the prosecution witnesses They fully verified the contents of the FIR and the testimony of the complaining medical officer confirmed the ocular evidence. No firearms recovered, no blood stains were identified on the identification of the co-accused who were not sent blank cases for ballistic analysis, as the use of stimulants in the alleged crime did not prove by the eyewitness testimony. The trial court was, in the circumstances, convicted with the help of the accused, properly punished for the crime. And the active support of fugitive accused \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
