In section 9 (c), 14 and 15, the association was unable to rely on testimony of the evidence of narcotics smuggling, relief, abatement or drug crime, which was not recorded during the investigation. The evidence of the witness was not disclosed anywhere, even when at the time of holding the suitcase by the accused in the container, he had noted any identification mark on the same Syed witness. Confessed that the trial case was not opened, or that any heroin was recovered from his presence, evidence of such witnesses, was disconnected, and a stand was made not only to note the number of this vehicle Failing what was said to be the case was allegedly brought. And could not provide the Bay Area where the aircraft was standing, no further evidence was brought against the accused, trial of the accused was recorded against the accused without any contradictory material / evidence, It was set aside, and the accused acquitted. They were charged and released to release them
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
