HASCOL PETROLEUM LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATIONAL RESOURCES, PAKISTAN SEC
28, 30A, 33 and 44 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XVII of 2002), Section 12 Constitutional application of any oil catering company to maintain 20 days stock of petroleum products for any catering Not building source infrastructure. An order challenging the appeal filed under section 12 of the Emergency Efficiency Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, terminated the default company's temporary marketing activities until compliance with these terms and conditions. Has released. The license company's request was that after imposing a fine, the authority was not legally allowed to suspend its activities before the appeal period expired and under the Pakistan Petroleum (Refining, Blending and Marketing) Rules, 1971 Suspend your activities under the Rule Authority. In the case of license revocation / suspension, fine and imprisonment, the terms of the sentence and the option of imposing the fine and suspension of the company defending the terms of the license were widespread, therefore, of a power Filing an appeal against instability will not terminate the use of other power, in the absence of restriction. The order, however, does not mean that the authority was barred from taking any other action as the company could challenge the order to suspend the license by filing an appeal under section 12 of the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority Ordinance 2002. And then it can take advantage of the under review. Section 13 imposes penalties on its authority as well as default comp
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
