Section 131 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Cancellation of Documents 39, 42 and 54, Declaration and Declaration of Interim Order, Approval of Approval of Goods In order to export the case, the plaintiff claimed that he was the owner of the goods that he alleged was stolen and the defendant intended to export to a foreign country. The stolen property belonging to the FIR in question could be related to the plaintiff and if it were the same, the export would be irreparable damage to the creditor's reputation by the same plaintiff's Export Act. And the balance of the facility was in favor of the plaintiff, which suffered irreparable harm. If the injunction was denied, then the application was allowed in the circumstances. r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
