Second appeal / revision against the order passed in appeal under section 100, 115, 47, 104 (1) (2) and section 104 of the OXLIII Specific Relief Act (of 1877), section 104 for specific performance, c. In the PC Maintenance suit, the terms of the settlement petition were filed in which the objections were submitted which were rejected by the Court of Appeal under Section 104 of the CPC, which passed the order passed in the hanging petition. Was suspended, the order passed by the appellate court in the execution order was dismissed under section 2 (2) of the CPC Not appreciated but it can be challenged in an appeal which was expressly allowed under section 104 of the CPC Order by section 104 of the CPC order or AXLIII but it was not allowed in the appeal. That can be challenged. ) In section 104, the CPC banned the appeal against the order passed by the appellate court; the appellant / decision makers did not share the amount they had objected to in the application for execution. And the parcel of the terms and conditions of the compromise decree was properly rejected by the appellant's order which the appellant imposed because the executing court proceeded beyond the terms of the agreement. Was not an option The primary fax records show that the jurisdiction exercised by the courts below was a breach of the law or that they used the jurisdiction illegally or illegally to exercise not only existing appeal but even revision. Not even satisfactory
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
