Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 249A of fraudulent, forgery, and use of a forged document An illegal refinement request was filed. One implication of this case is that the land was fraudulently sold through the appointment of a local commission, together with the sub-registrar Petitioner's staff, who, at the relevant time, served in the office of the sub-registrar. Were performing. Investigations with vendors, shopkeepers, and authentic witnesses and applicants of the alleged bogus sale deed were placed in column number 2 of the report under Section 173, CR PC, with the recommendation that they be excluded to the extent possible. The Investigation Officer's recommendations, the trial court summoned the applicants to stand trial, the applicants denied the correctness of the application filed under Section 249A, CRPC, which did not appear on record. It is likely that the applicant had committed any fraud with the seller or the applicant was not nominated in the FIR nor was the accused complained of any special encroachment. Was obliged to play his role. Applicants to the local commission whose report allegedly filed a bogus sale contract, but failed to do so, have no material material linking applicants to the preparation of a fake sale contract. Was not available. Registrars, applicants cannot be deemed to have provided access to the alleged fraudster. In the case
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
