CHAUDHRY TEX THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus HABIB BANK LTD. THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER
Sections 9, 10 and 22 apply for leave to defend plaintiff / lender for recovery of debt in the Bankers' Advance Act (XVIII of 1891), section 4 suit, failing to repay in advance, Plaintiff Bank files suit for recovery The claim against the defendant against the claim that the defendant filed for the claim was dismissed and the judgment of the case was pronounced. The defendant's original argument was that a decree and decree was approved on the basis of photocopying of the documents in connection with the original reconstruction of the loan. Documents were not prepared The defendant did not dispute the loan amount for the defendant, no doubt that it was under the legal obligation to present the original documents, the statement of the amount in question, Was certified under 1891, by which the bank was annexed to the plaintiff. The defendant did not raise any objection to the above statement. Nor did the dispute arise that it was stated that the defendant had not borrowed the money, in the circumstances, it was declared right
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
