Sections 302 (b) and 109 Qatil Um, Definition of Doubt Benefit of Suspicion During filing of FIR, the complainant did not claim himself to be an eyewitness, nor claimed to see any action at the scene of the incident. From where the snail was recovered. And after submitting it to the court, it was sent to the deceased complainant, the complainant had materially improved his statement and stated that the improvement had come forward as an eyewitness to the complainant's incident. Tried to change his stance, causing himself serious doubts. Because the complainant was not a resident of the house adjoining the accused, he was not a natural witness of the incident, but was exposed as a witness of the occasion as he failed to justify his presence at the relevant time, One witness did not support it, claiming other witnesses and the recovery of the complainant's criminal weapon suspected to be standing alone, was never enough to convict, the defendants' confession, even voluntary. Also found, the conviction may not be sufficient to prove, if the version given by the prosecution does not fit I was given, confession of the accused such delay was recorded. Nine days after the arrest of the accused, such confessional statements of the accused were not appropriate in the story, even in similar circumstances the accused could not be relied on safely to convict where the prosecution relied on direct evidence. Was, he should not only be straight, natural and confident with impressive work
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
